peacocking sentence in Hindi

Examples

1. *"'speedy delete "'as copyvio, but no problem with re-creating in the future if it can be re-written without copyvio and the peacocking that comes with it . talk ) 15 : 11, 10 April 2008 ( UTC)
2. I suspected he was not notable due to the high level of peacocking, but it turns out he is a member of the National Academy of Medicine, which seems like a solid pass on WP : PROF . talk ) 18 : 14, 29 June 2016 ( UTC)
3. I only see that the title of " Seneschal " bears a striking resemblance to the username of the user who created the article, and that it indeed contains a fair amount of peacocking, which again is very typical for autobiographical articles . talk ) 17 : 25, 26 November 2010 ( UTC)
4. Since the reliable secondary sources cover the same ground being referenced here, I think it is better practice and preferable to stick with those sources and references . 2 ) Also, using terms like " A great majority " is also discouraged on Wikipedia as it is regarding as PEACOCKING or using peacock adjectives.
5. The " peacocking " element was not included into the script, but added to the episode during filming after actor Aziz Ansari mentioned to show co-creator Greg Daniels that he believed the character would be interested in pickup artist tactics like those outlined in Neil Strauss'book " The Game : Penetrating the Secret Society of Pickup Artists ".
6. "There can be a tendency, " he said in an interview, " of reporters kind of peacocking in front of each other to show each other and their editors, ` I'm the one, I can ask the same question a different way for the 18th time to get the press secretary to say something different . "'
7. *"'Delete "'- although less puffy WP : PEACOCKing compared to Rashid M . Rashid article also up for deletion makes it seem perhaps more likely notablity could be established-getting to contribute to a widely used source ( eMedicine ) is weakly supportive-but overall I just don't see notablity for inclusion in wikipedia as yet established.
8. Appears to be testing the waters with a minor edit, presumably to see if we are alert to changes in the article or whether they can get away with more drastic changes ( past experience is removal of Inala from the article, removal of information about flooding, and other white-washing / peacocking ); I am guessing our serial vandal doesn't know about watchlists.
9. These prior edits have all contained the exact same peacocking, without any evidence of substantiation ( by definition no Linux distribution is " without precedent " since the precedents ( derivation ) are the " whole point " that let people create multiple distributions, and a distribution cannot at the same time be " built from scratch " and based on " Slackware, Hardened Linux From Scratch, Zenwalk, Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu, NetBSD and FreeBSD " ( this rises rather rapidly to WP : WEASEL ) ).
10. WP : BOOMERANG has also been suggested with this individual everytime they've come to a noticeboard because of their refusal to get it in combination with their tendency toward WP : IDHT . The article they are stuck on has been edited and re-edited numerous times by several editors over several months to remove the poorly sourced or unsourced content, fluff, peacocking, undue weight and resume-like additions they insist on adding over and over again .-- '17 : 13, 2 December 2016 ( UTC)