polylectal meaning in Hindi

Examples

1. In the first chapter of, Peter Trudgill makes the case that these semantic contexts form the basis of intelligibility across varieties and that the process is irregular and " ad hoc " rather than the result of any sort of rule-governed passive polylectal competence.
2. The description of a cognitively real polylectal grammar came with's set of rules for the speech of Norwich that, presumably, could generate any possible output for a specific population of speakers and was psychologically real for such speakers such that native residents who normally exhibited sound mergers ( e . g . between the vowels of " days " and " daze " ) could accurately and consistently make the distinction if called upon to imitate older Norwich speakers.
3. argues that comprehension across varieties, when it is found, isn't sufficient enough evidence for the claim that polylectal grammars are part of speakers'linguistic competence . argues that an extrapolated panlectal ( or even broadly polylectal ) grammar from " idiosyncratic " grammars, such as those found in, would still not be part of speakers'linguistic competence; argues that attempting a polylectal grammar that encodes for a large number of dialects becomes too bizarre and that the traditional reconstructed proto-language is more appropriate for the stated benefits of polylectal grammars ., notable for advocating the construction of polylectal grammars, says that the generative rules of such grammars should be panlectal in the sense that they are " potentially " learned in the acquisition process, though no speaker should be expected to learn all of them.
4. argues that comprehension across varieties, when it is found, isn't sufficient enough evidence for the claim that polylectal grammars are part of speakers'linguistic competence . argues that an extrapolated panlectal ( or even broadly polylectal ) grammar from " idiosyncratic " grammars, such as those found in, would still not be part of speakers'linguistic competence; argues that attempting a polylectal grammar that encodes for a large number of dialects becomes too bizarre and that the traditional reconstructed proto-language is more appropriate for the stated benefits of polylectal grammars ., notable for advocating the construction of polylectal grammars, says that the generative rules of such grammars should be panlectal in the sense that they are " potentially " learned in the acquisition process, though no speaker should be expected to learn all of them.
5. argues that comprehension across varieties, when it is found, isn't sufficient enough evidence for the claim that polylectal grammars are part of speakers'linguistic competence . argues that an extrapolated panlectal ( or even broadly polylectal ) grammar from " idiosyncratic " grammars, such as those found in, would still not be part of speakers'linguistic competence; argues that attempting a polylectal grammar that encodes for a large number of dialects becomes too bizarre and that the traditional reconstructed proto-language is more appropriate for the stated benefits of polylectal grammars ., notable for advocating the construction of polylectal grammars, says that the generative rules of such grammars should be panlectal in the sense that they are " potentially " learned in the acquisition process, though no speaker should be expected to learn all of them.
6. argues that comprehension across varieties, when it is found, isn't sufficient enough evidence for the claim that polylectal grammars are part of speakers'linguistic competence . argues that an extrapolated panlectal ( or even broadly polylectal ) grammar from " idiosyncratic " grammars, such as those found in, would still not be part of speakers'linguistic competence; argues that attempting a polylectal grammar that encodes for a large number of dialects becomes too bizarre and that the traditional reconstructed proto-language is more appropriate for the stated benefits of polylectal grammars ., notable for advocating the construction of polylectal grammars, says that the generative rules of such grammars should be panlectal in the sense that they are " potentially " learned in the acquisition process, though no speaker should be expected to learn all of them.
7. argues that comprehension across varieties, when it is found, isn't sufficient enough evidence for the claim that polylectal grammars are part of speakers'linguistic competence . argues that an extrapolated panlectal ( or even broadly polylectal ) grammar from " idiosyncratic " grammars, such as those found in, would still not be part of speakers'linguistic competence; argues that attempting a polylectal grammar that encodes for a large number of dialects becomes too bizarre and that the traditional reconstructed proto-language is more appropriate for the stated benefits of polylectal grammars ., notable for advocating the construction of polylectal grammars, says that the generative rules of such grammars should be panlectal in the sense that they are " potentially " learned in the acquisition process, though no speaker should be expected to learn all of them.