recursive definition in a sentence
Examples
- That recursive definitions are valid-meaning that a recursive definition identifies a unique function-is a theorem of set theory, the proof of which is non-trivial.
- This comes in contrast with the direct meaning of the notion of semantic consequence, that quantifies over all structures in a particular language, which is clearly not a recursive definition.
- In a function defined by a recursive definition, each value is defined by a fixed first-order formula of other, previously defined values of the same function or other functions, which might be simply constants.
- Existence and uniqueness of the general transfinite recursive definition of sets was demonstrated in 1928 by von Neumann for both Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory and Neumann's own set theory ( which later developed into NBG set theory ).
- Therefore any recursive coding of a nonstandard model onto the natural numbers, along with a recursive definition ( acting on codes ) for the model's addition and multiplication operations will give a recursive separator, which cannot exist.
- A "'recursive definition "'( or "'inductive definition "') in mathematical logic and computer science is used to define the elements in a set in terms of other elements in the set ( Aczel 1978 : 740ff ).
- The topological recursion is then a recursive definition of infinite sequences of symmetric meromorphic n-forms \ omega _ { g, n } on \ Sigma ^ n, with poles at ramification points only, for integers ge " 0 such that 2g-2 + n > 0.
- One such function, which is provable total but not primitive recursive, is Ackermann function : since it is recursively defined, it is indeed easy to prove its computability ( However, a similar diagonalization argument can also be built for all functions defined by recursive definition; thus, there are provable total functions that cannot be defined recursively ).
- In fact, the model of " any " theory containing PA obtained by the systematic construction of the arithmetical model existence theorem, is " always " non-standard with a non-equivalent provability predicate and a non-equivalent way to interpret its own construction, so that this construction is non-recursive ( as recursive definitions would be unambiguous ).
- Normalisability is a rare feature of most non-trivial type theories, which is a big departure from the logical world . ( Recall that almost every logical derivation has an equivalent normal derivation . ) To sketch the reason : in type theories that admit recursive definitions, it is possible to write programs that never reduce to a value; such looping programs can generally be given any type.